Access you can prove
SMS multi-factor authentication, audited break-glass admin, multi-user tenancy with roles, a signed per-action audit trail, and strict tenant isolation.
FinOps tooling touches production and the bill, so weak access control is a non-starter for security review. You need MFA, least privilege, and an audit trail that stands up to scrutiny.
Built to do the work, not just show it
SMS MFA
Second-factor step-up on the existing login, staged so nobody is locked out.
Roles + break-glass
Owner/admin/member/viewer roles with an audited break-glass admin path.
Signed audit trail
Every action, approval, and override is a signed row with pre/post state.
Tenant isolation
Enforced at the middleware and repository layers — never weakened.
From signal to result
Authenticate
Password + optional SMS second factor.
Authorize
Role-based access with least privilege.
Audit
Everything sensitive is recorded for review.
- MFA rolls out with advise-then-enforce guardrails so the existing base isn’t mass-locked-out.
- Isolation is guarded by tests and enforced at two layers.
- Break-glass admin access is fully audited.
Questions
Do you support MFA?
Yes — SMS second-factor step-up, rolled out with a grace window and break-glass so nobody is locked out.
How is tenant data isolated?
At both the middleware (request identity) and repository (row scoping) layers, guarded by tests.