Container economics

Kubernetes cost, allocated

Allocate Kubernetes spend down to cluster, namespace, and pod, and surface over-provisioned workloads that are quietly burning money.

A shared cluster hides who owns what. Node bills don’t map to teams or services, and over-requested pods waste capacity that never shows up as a line item.

What you get

Built to do the work, not just show it

Cluster → namespace → pod

Break cluster cost down to the workloads actually consuming it.

Right-sizing signals

Flag over-provisioned pods whose requests dwarf real usage.

Team attribution

Map namespaces to owners so cost has an address.

Multi-cluster

Aggregate across clusters in the workspace.

How it works

From signal to result

1

Ingest

Cluster + workload metrics are collected.

2

Allocate

Cost is distributed to namespaces and pods.

3

Right-size

Over-provisioned workloads surface as findings.

Why it’s different
  • Over-provisioned-pod findings flow into the same remediation funnel.
  • Allocation is per cluster and rolls into the portfolio.
  • Works alongside AWS + GCP cost, not as a separate silo.

Questions

How is pod cost computed?

From cluster cost distributed by workload resource usage down to the pod.

Can it recommend right-sizing?

Yes — over-provisioned pods surface as findings you can act on.

Related capabilities

Ship savings, not slides

See your cloud bill drop in 30 days.